Skip to main content
Use per-signal performance charts to understand which filters and signal types produce the best data for your credit spend — then scale what works and refine what does not.

Metrics per signal

MetricMeaning
Hiring managers sourcedNew contacts returned by Job Listening or Market Mapping runs
Hiring signals detectedHiring-related posts found from Monitor Connections
Credits spentTotal credits consumed by sourcing, monitoring, and exports for this signal
Avg. cost per hiring managerCredits spent divided by hiring managers sourced

Weekly review

1

Check volume

Are hiring managers sourcing at the cadence you expect? Job Listening should add contacts after each 24-hour cycle if filters match active postings.
2

Check relevance

Spot-check titles and companies. Over-broad job filters waste credits on irrelevant hiring managers.
3

Check credit efficiency

Compare avg. cost per hiring manager across signals. High email enrichment on low-intent lists increases cost without improving outbound quality.
4

Adjust one variable

Change filters, enrichment choices, or export strategy on underperforming signals — one change at a time.

When to pause a signal

Pause signals that consistently source irrelevant hiring managers or burn credits without usable exports. Fix filters before resuming.
  • Low relevance — many sourced contacts do not match your niche
  • Zero results — filters may be too narrow; broaden location or title keywords
  • Credit pressure — reduce enrichment columns or tighten filters before upgrading plans

Scaling winners

When a Job Listening signal produces steady, relevant hiring managers at a reasonable credit cost:
  1. Duplicate the signal with adjacent title keywords or geographies
  2. Enable auto-stream to your Instantly or HeyReach campaign
  3. Keep Monitor Connections running for warm network overlap